DocketNumber： No. 33168.
Citation Numbers： 162 So. 804, 183 La. 67
Judges： Rogers, Brunot, Higgins, O'Niell, Company, Fournet
Filed Date： 2/4/1935
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
Plaintiff as the beneficiary named in two industrial life insurance policies issued on the life of Reuben Cryer, sued the insurance company to recover $250, the amount called for by the policies. The suit was based on Act No. 193 of 1906, plaintiff claiming that under the statute she was entitled to have the accumulated reserves applied to the extended value of the policies, since the insured on their lapse for nonpayment of the premiums had not exercised his privilege of applying the reserves to other values.
The insurance company set up by way of defense that Act No. 193 of 1906 was unconstitutional; that the statute did not *Page 69 apply to the business of industrial life insurance; and that under the stipulations of the policies plaintiff was entitled to their paid-up value, which was $32.40, which amount was tendered to plaintiff.
The First city court for the city of New Orleans, where the suit was filed, gave plaintiff a judgment for the full amount of the policies. The Court of Appeal for the parish of Orleans maintained the constitutionality of Act No. 193 of 1906, but amended the judgment by reducing the amount thereof to $32.40. The case is now before us on plaintiff's application for a writ of review.
Since defendant did not apply for a writ of review nor join in plaintiff's application for the writ, there is no occasion for us to consider defendant's contention that Act No. 193 of 1906 is unconstitutional. Ware v. Couvillion,
For the reasons assigned in the Watson Case, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is annulled and the judgment of the First city court is reinstated and made the final judgment of this court; all costs of suit to be paid by the defendant insurance company.
HIGGINS, J., recused.