Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 6/10/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mr. Torres:
You have asked for our opinion on the following issue:
Whether a full-time employee with one state agency holding a part-time position with another state agency must be placed in overtime pay status or may that individual be classified as a part-time employee of the other state agency for the purposes of the Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System?
This concern arises out of a recent decision by the Department of Civil Service concerning an employee in a full-time position in the Department of Natural Resources. That individual was also holding a part-time position with the Department of Civil Service. Civil Service determined that this part-time employment was in overtime status. Their reasoning is that the State is a single employer for the purposes of wage payments.
You state that to classify an employee in this manner would directly affect your membership since part-time compensation may be included in a member's compensation for retirement benefits but overtime compensation is not considered in this computation.
Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS) is established and empowered by LSA-R.S.
For the purposes of LASERS, an "employee" means any person legally occupying a position in state service. LSA-R.S.
These definitions imply a division along agency and department lines for the purposes of employment status under LASERS. The fact that an "agency" means any governmental body employing persons and includes departments within its meaning gives strong credence to this view.
Moreover, the treatment of a position held by an employee is of a singular nature. Any other conclusion inferring that full-time employment in one agency and part-time employment in another are the same "position" for the purposes of LASERS would be in contravention of what appears to be the intent of the pertinent statutes.
Finally, LSA-R.S.
Note that this opinion is limited in scope to LASERS and in no way questions or rejects the determination by the Department of Civil Service in this matter. Their conclusion was made for the purposes of the Department of Civil Service alone and does not have any effect on LASERS.
I hope this sufficiently addresses your concerns. If our office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: ___________________________ CARLOS M. FINALET, III Assistant Attorney General
RPI:CMF:glb