Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 9/27/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mr. Drennen:
In your letter of August 30, 1996, you request from our office an expansion of our Opinion No. 91-98 relative to disclosure of information contained in Office of Risk Management claim files pursuant to the Public Records Law. In particular you wish this office to address the following:
"1. Are medical malpractice claims or worker's compensation claims, that are designated as open merely because future medicals are to be paid on these claims, protected from outside viewing by Act 732?
"2. If a claim is closed, are certain items in the file still protected by Act 732? Specifically are items such as correspondence between attorney and adjuster, attorney's recommendations and opinions to the adjuster, etc., exempted from disclosure?"
Act
Considering the foregoing, it follows that in medical malpractice claims where future medicals and related benefits are to be paid as they are incurred, because La. R.S.
With regard to worker's compensation claims, the prohibition of disclosure of information contained in files where medical payments are pending, extends to all closed files. The Public Records Law, being a general law, is superseded by the Worker's Compensation Law which is a special law. Worker's compensation statutes make specific reference to the confidentiality of files and of records maintained with the Office of Worker's Compensation. This interpretation is in accord with prior opinions issued from this office, wherein we concluded that records, papers, documents, names and medical records of any worker's compensation claims are not subject to the Public Records Act. See Opinion No. 92-104 and Opinion No. 84-805 which we are attaching for your review. We qualify Opinion 92-104 by noting that La. R.S.
We note that Opinion No. 91-98 suggests that closed files be examined prior to disclosure of their contents and we list what information contained in the files should be freely divulged. Though we made no mention of your concern vis a vis correspondence between attorneys and adjusters, communications relating to opinions and recommendations between adjusters and attorneys are exempt from disclosure. They remain confidential both under the attorney-client privilege and the work product rule. See Rule 1.6 of the State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct; La C.E. art.
We hope the foregoing interpretation of the law will be helpful to you. Should you require further assistance or clarification, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
BY: __________________________________ ATHENA B. PIEDRAHITA Assistant Attorney General
ABP:drl