Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 7/26/1996
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mr. Bruneau:
We are in receipt of your request for an Attorney General's opinion regarding an interpretation of LSA-R.S.
LSA-R.S.
"F. A list of names and addresses to whom address confirmation notices are sent and whether or not each person responded to the confirmation notice shall be maintained for a period of two years and shall be open to inspection and copying as provided in R.S.
18:154 . Ninety days prior to a federal election the names and addresses of those persons on the inactive list shall be published for one day in the official journal of the parish governing authority or in a newspaper calculated to provide maximum notice in the parish." (Emphasis added).
As you pointed out in your request, R.S.
LSA-R.S.
"(9) ``Federal election' means a general, special, primary, or runoff election for federal office; a convention or caucus of a political party which has authority to nominate a candidate for federal office; a primary election held for the selection of delegates to a national nominating convention of a political party; and a primary election held for the expression of a preference for the nomination of individuals for election to the office of president."
Your request states that it is your opinion that the clear intent of R.S.
LSA-C.C. art.
"Art. 9. Clear and unambiguous law
When a law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be applied as written and no further interpretation may be made in search of the intent of the legislature.
Art. 10. Language susceptible of different meanings
When the language of the law is susceptible of different meanings, it must be interpreted as having the meaning that best conforms to the purpose of the law."
If the law were interpreted to mean that a publication of inactive voters is required both 90 days before a federal primary election and 90 days before a federal general election, it is our opinion that such an interpretation leads to an absurd result: the publication of the inactive list as close as 30 days apart in some instances, both publications appearing prior to the primary election, and no knowledge of whether a general election will be necessary. Therefore, it is our opinion that R.S.
If we can be of further assistance, please advise.
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB ATTORNEY GENERAL
ANGIE ROGERS LaPLACE Assistant Attorney General
ARL/pb
cc: W. Fox McKeithen, Secretary of State Jerry M. Fowler, Commissioner of Elections
arl\opinions\op. 96\96.328
Date Received: Date Released:
Angie Rogers LaPlace Assistant Attorney General