Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 7/2/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Representative Guillory:
An employment contract between a city/employer and the union provides that the employer pay an employee who leaves his job for reasons other than disciplinary severance pay at termination. You question if the parties are legally bound to do so.
In short, we believe that the contract creates a legal obligation and therefore the parties are bound by it. An expenditure of public funds must be addressed in light of Article
Although we have consistently opined that the payment of a bonus or any other gratuitous, unearned payment to public employees is prohibited by Article
It is our opinion that the severance pay outlined in the contract is not a bonus or gratuitous, unearned payment. Rather, it is an earned benefit contemplated at the time of employment. The provision for severance pay in the contract is a legal obligation of the city/employer and accordingly the payment of such is in the discharge of a legal duty. It is not a prohibited donation. We distinguish this opinion from our prior opinion regarding severance pay to a public employee upon her termination.3 In that opinion, there was no contract and severance pay was not an earned benefit. Here, we have a contract that creates the obligation to pay it.
We trust that this opinion adequately responds to your request. If you have any questions or comments, please contact our office.
Yours verly truly,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
BY: __________________________ TINA VICARI GRANT Assistant Attorney General
RPI/TVG/dam