Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 9/6/1995
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mayor Bowen:
This office is in receipt of your request for an opinion of the Attorney General in regard to selection for municipal police officers. You ask "how is seniority determined when two or more persons qualify for a municipal police officer position in cities having a population of 13,000 and above". In order to clearly understand your question, it appears after inquiry by telephone that your question is whether a selection can be made from a choice of three or must the position be given to the individual with next highest rank and longest service without consideration of qualifications.
We must conclude under the law the selection cannot be made from a choice of three. R.S.
In Stevens v. City of Baton Rouge, (M.D.La 1988) the court recognized promotions are made from a promotional list consisting of those person who have successfully passed the promotional examination for the position in question. The Court further stated the persons are listed on the promotional list "in the order of their total departmental seniority and theposition must be offered to that person on the promotional listwith the greatest total departmental seniority." (Emphasis added)
The law does not allow a selection by the appointing authority on the basis of the person considered best qualified from those who have passed the promotional test. Until the law is amended it must be given to the individual who has the greatest seniority by years of service who is on the promotional list.
We hope this sufficiently answers your inquiry, but if we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
By: ___________________________ BARBARA B. RUTLEDGE Assistant Attorney General
BBR