Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 4/22/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Judge Fuselier:
Your request for an Attorney General Opinion has been forwarded to me for research and reply. In particular, you have asked the following question:
May a city judge, who imposes imprisonment for the violation of a city ordinance, include in such sentence the condition that the prisoner shall not be eligible for work release programs or trusteeship?
Generally, the trial judge is given wide discretion in the imposition of sentence as long as the sentence does not exceed statutory and constitutional limits. State v. Lanclos,
B. Each sheriff shall establish written rules for the administration of the work release program and shall determine those inmates who may participate in the release program, except that no inmate may participate in the program if his sentence so stipulates. (Emphasis added)
This language clearly indicates that sentencing judges have the authority to stipulate as a condition to a prisoner's sentence, non-eligibility for work release or trustee programs. This is consistent with a judge's broad powers to suspend sentences under C.Cr.P art. 894 and to condition probation under C.Cr.P. art.
Therefore it is the opinion of this office that a city court judge has the authority to stipulate that the prisoner shall not be eligible for work release or trustee programs when sentencing that prisoner for violation of a city ordinance.
I hope this opinion has adequately addressed your questions. If this office can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. With warmest regards, I am
Sincerely,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: _________________________ ELLISON C. TRAVIS Assistant Attorney General