Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 10/14/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Rep. Faucheux:
You requested the opinion of this office concerning whether the State is responsible for start up costs for the construction of a facility as per R.S.
R.S.
The board is given the authority to purchase or otherwise acquire, construct, reconstruct, rehabilitate, improve, repair, operate, lease, mange and administer or enter into contracts for the management, administration and operation of a juvenile detention facility, shelter care facility or such other juvenile justice facility as are useful, necessary, expedient, or convenient to carry out the plans and purposes of the Commission. R.S.
R.S.
A. On the basis of information provided in accordance with R.S.
15:1083 , the Department of Public Safety and Corrections shall determine the actual cost of operating the juvenile detention facility situated in Tangipahoa Parish when the facility files a statement requesting participation and funding under this Part. The department shall enter into a contractual agreement with the participating regional detention facility, specifying the services to be provided and the dollar amount of the contractual agreement, which shall be the actual cost of operating the facility or program. This amount shall be paid in quarterly advances to the participating regional detention facility.B. In order to develop the detention facility desperately needed in the state and region for juveniles who are clients of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, the department shall provide start-up funds for the establishment of the facility or program. (Emphasis added).
It is our understanding that the Juvenile Detention Facility was constructed several years ago; however, a dispute arose between the contractor and the Commission and the contractor filed suit1 against the Commission. A judgment was rendered against the Commission by the Twenty-First Judicial District Court. H.B. 1743 provides for an appropriation of $63,896.60 plus interest, court costs and expert witness fees to pay the judgment.
We were unable to find a Louisiana statute or jurisprudence that specifically defined start-up funds. The Internal Revenue Code,
"(1) Start-up expenditures. — The term "start-up expenditure" means any amount —
(A) paid or incurred in connection with —
(i) investigating the creation or acquisition of an active trade or business, or
(ii) creating an active trade or business, or
(iii) any activity engaged in for profit and for the production of income before the day on which the active trade or business begins, in anticipation of such activity becoming an active trade or business, and
(B) which, if paid or incurred in connection with the operation of an existing active trade or business (in the same field as the trade or business referred to in subparagraph (A)), would be allowable as a deduction for the taxable year in which paid or incurred.
It is the opinion of this office that start up funds for the purpose of R.S.
As to whether the Louisiana legislature is required under Louisiana law to appropriate these start-up funds, our courts have stated:
It is elementary that the "fiscal affairs of the state, the possession, control, administration, and disposition of the property, funds, and revenues of the state, are matters appertaining exclusively to the legislative department." State v. Duhe,
201 La. 192 ,9 So.2d 517 ,521 (1942) (citing Carter v. State, 42 La. Ann. 927, 933, 8 So. 836, 837 (1890)).
Meredith v. Ieyoub, 96-1110, p. 5 (La. 9/9/97),
The legislature has absolute control over the finances of the state, except as limited by constitutional provisions. Woodard v. Reily,
Except as expressly provided by the Constitution, no other branch of government, nor any person holding office in one of them, may exercise the legislative function. New Orleans Firefighters Association v. CivilService Commission of the City of New Orleans,
Thus, under the Louisiana Constitution, the legislature and only the legislature has the authority to determine whether or not to appropriate the start up costs of the Juvenile Detention Facility. Op.Atty.Gen. 03-0241.
We also call your attention to La. Const. Art.
Trusting this adequately responds to your request, we remain
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
BY: ________________________________ MARTHA S. HESS Assistant Attorney General
RPI/MSH
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE RELEASED: October 14, 2003
Woodard v. Reily , 244 La. 337 ( 1963 )
Bruneau v. Edwards , 517 So. 2d 818 ( 1987 )
Louisiana Ass'n of Educators v. Edwards , 521 So. 2d 390 ( 1988 )
New Orleans, Etc. v. Civ. Service, Etc. , 422 So. 2d 402 ( 1982 )
Quarles v. Jackson Parish Police Jury , 482 So. 2d 833 ( 1986 )