Judges: RICHARD P. IEYOUB
Filed Date: 8/3/1993
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mr. Wooden:
On behalf of the Assessor's Association, you have requested the opinion of this office regarding House Bill 1050, which became Act
Act 1030 enacts R.S.
"Notwithstanding any other provisions of law to the contrary, the buyer under a bond for deed contract shall be deemed, for purposes of the homestead exemption only, to own any immovable property he has purchased and is occupying under a bond for deed, and may be eligible for the homestead exemption provided in Article
VII , Section20 (A) of the Constitution of Louisiana if otherwise qualified. The buyer under a bond for deed contract shall apply for the homestead exemption each year."
With regard to Act 1030, the Assessor's Association asks that this office examine the following questions:
1. Do the provisions concerning ownership contained in Act 1030 conflict with the provisions of this state's Constitution relative to the homestead exemption?
2. Can a homestead exemption be granted on property being purchased under a "bond for deed" contract?
Your questions require this office to examine the meaning of the word "owned", as contained within La. Const. (1974) Art.
We note that the definition of a "Bond for Deed" as set forth in R.S.
"The bond for deed is a contract to sell real property, in which the purchase price is to be paid by the buyer to the seller in installments and in which the seller after payment of a stipulated sum agrees to deliver title to the buyer." (emphasis added)
This definition makes it clear that a sale does not take place, and title to the property does not pass to the purchaser, until after payment of the "stipulated sum" or "installments" referred to therein. In our opinion, passage of title to the buyer is essential if the property is to be considered as "owned" by the buyer within the meaning of La. Const. (1974) Art.
R.S.
We are, however, unaware of any cases which have been filed alleging the unconstitutionality of Act 1030, and our research did not reveal any reported cases which have tested the constitutionality of homestead exemptions as applied to property which is the subject of a bond for deed contract. Therefore, this office is constrained to presume Act 1030, and the statutory provision enacted thereby, to be constitutional. State in the interest of J.A.V.,
In light of the presumed constitutionality of Act 1030 and R.S.
Trusting this adequately responds to your request, I remain,
Yours very truly,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB Attorney General
BY: JEANNE-MARIE ZERINGUE Assistant Attorney General
RPI:JMZ:jav 0323n