DocketNumber： No. 2015 CA 1304
Citation Numbers： 194 So. 3d 56, 2015 La.App. 1 Cir. 1304, 2016 La. App. LEXIS 704, 2016 WL 1535952
Judges： Crain, Guidry, Higginbotham, McDonald, Pettigrew
Filed Date： 4/13/2016
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
dissenting in part.
[ 1 At the hearing on the motion to tax costs, DOTD had the opportunity to present the testimony necessary to establish the reasonableness of its experts’ fees, but failed to do so. Therefore, I would reverse that part of the award of costs that represents the experts’ fees. Under this circumstance, I would not remand to allow DOTD a second opportunity to meet its burden of proof on the motion to tax costs. I agree with affirming the remainder of the judgment.