DocketNumber： [App. No. 58, September Term, 1964.]
Citation Numbers： 204 A.2d 563, 236 Md. 642, 1964 Md. LEXIS 956
Judges： Henderson, C.J., and Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Sybert and Oppenheimer
Filed Date： 11/16/1964
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 3/3/2016
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency attacks the constitutionality of the Act on several grounds. His contentions are all answered by prior decisions of this Court. See Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Meredith v. Director, 226 Md. 653; Simmons v. Director, 227 Md. 661; McDonogh v. Director, 229 Md. 626; Williams v. Director, 232 Md. 632. Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, relied on by the applicant is clearly distinguishable on the facts.
Application denied.
Meredith v. Director of Patuxent Institution , 226 Md. 653 ( 1961 )
Simmons v. Director of Patuxent Institution , 227 Md. 661 ( 1962 )
McDonough v. Director of Patuxent Institution , 229 Md. 626 ( 1962 )
Ransom v. Warden , 236 Md. 639 ( 1964 )
Eggleston v. State , 209 Md. 504 ( 1956 )
Williams v. Director , 232 Md. 632 ( 1963 )