Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Tatung

*
IN THE
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE *
COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT
*
OF MARYLAND
v. *
AG No. 38
CELESTINE TATUNG *
September Term, 2022
*
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by the Petitioner, the
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Celestine Tatung, on
August 9, 2023, in the above-captioned case, in which the parties advise that the
Respondent agrees that his conduct, as described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 1.15
(safekeeping property) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and
Federal Immigration Rules of Professional Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. §
1003.102(n) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), (q)(1) and (2)
(diligence), and (r)(1)-(3) (communication) and that the Respondent consents to a
reprimand, it is this 15th day of August 2023
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Celestine
Tatung, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property) of the District
of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and Federal Immigration Rules of Professional
Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. §1003.102(n) (conduct prejudicial to the administration
of justice), (q)(1) and (2) (diligence), and (r)(1)-(3) (communication).
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials
Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this
document is authentic.
2023-08-15 14:01-04:00 Shirley M. Watts
Senior Justice
Gregory Hilton, Clerk