Citation Numbers: 87 Op. Att'y Gen. 66
Judges: J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.
Filed Date: 5/2/2002
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Mr. Gray:
You have requested our opinion whether the Board of County Commissioners for Frederick County may approve certain budget amendments relating to the County schools. Your inquiry was prompted by several requests by the local board of education to amend its budget for the current fiscal year, to increase the amount listed in the "surplus" line of the revenue portion of the budget and to add offsetting expenditures. We understand that the approved budget originally included $1 million in estimated surplus1 and that an audit after the close of the prior fiscal year subsequently revealed an actual surplus exceeding $5 million.
You included with your request a memorandum by the County Attorney. A copy of that memorandum is attached to this opinion. The County Attorney concluded that the County Commissioners may not amend the budget they had previously adopted in order to recognize an increase in the amount of "surplus" listed under revenue from "local" sources.
We have carefully reviewed the County Attorney's memorandum and agree with that conclusion. Like the County Attorney, we reach this conclusion because the General Assembly has generally prohibited the Frederick County Commissioners from increasing the local budget after it has been adopted. Public Local Laws for Frederick County, Frederick County Code, §§ 2-7-5, 2-7-6.
We add two caveats. We note, as did the County Attorney, that the proposed budget amendments list the increase in surplus under revenues from "local" sources. If the increased surplus were attributable to unanticipated State or federal revenue) e.g., receipt of federal funds in excess of estimates) the County Commissioners would have discretion to approve the expenditure of those funds even after adoption of the budget. See Annotated Code of Maryland, Education Article ("ED"), §
Second, we do not adopt the County Attorney's analysis of the Education Article with respect to unanticipated local funds. The County Attorney observed that E.D. §
Very truly yours,
J. Joseph Curran, Jr. Attorney General
Robert N. McDonald Chief Counsel Opinions Advice
*Page 76