Judges: Cornish, King, Peabody, Strout, Whitehouse
Filed Date: 8/29/1907
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/10/2024
Writ of entry, entered at April term, 1904. Plea, general issue. Case tried at that term, resulting in verdict for demandant. Exceptions to ruling of presiding Justice sustained by
In pleas puis darrein continuance, after the cause has been continued, "great certainty was always required,” and it "was not sufficient to say generally that after the last continuance such a thing happened, but the day of the continuance must have been alleged where the matter of defence arose.” Chitty’s Pleading, Vol. 1, p. 660.
The omission to state in the plea the day of the last continuance is fatal. Cummings v. Smith, 50 Maine, 569; Jewett v. Jewett, 58 Maine, 234; Augusta v. Moulton, 75 Maine, 551; Field v. Cappers, 81 Maine, 36. In Howell v. Hayden, 40 Maine, 582, this question was not raised or decided.
The plea in this case does not state the day of the last continuance, and is therefore fatally defective. It is not necessary to consider other objections to the plea.
The plea waives all former pleading, and if on demurrer it is adjudged bad, the judgment goes in chief unless the court allows a repleader, on terms, which it may do as decided in Augusta v. Moulton, supra. This result renders the defendants’ exceptions unimportant, and they are overruled.
To avoid a possible injustice, a repleader will be awarded.
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained. Demurrer sustained. Plea bad. Pepleader nunc pro tunc awarded on payment of costs since filing the plea.