DocketNumber: Docket No. 144
Citation Numbers: 145 Mich. 618
Judges: Blair, Carpenter, Grant, Hooker, McAlvay, Montgomery, Moore, Ostrander
Filed Date: 9/20/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/8/2022
The plaintiff brought suit to recover the válue of railroad ties which he claims to have sold and delivered to the defendant. It was the, claim of defendant that it had a contract with one Ruonawara to deliver to it ties, that afterwards this contract was assigned by Ruonawara to S. Juntilla & Co., that the ties involved in this controversy were delivered under the contract so assigned, that bills were rendered therefor in the name of S. Juntilla & Co., that payments thereon were made for a large amount, and that afterwards it was found that
It was the claim of the plaintiff that the ties for which suit was brought were not delivered under the Ruonawara contract which was assigned to Juntilla & Co., but that the plaintiff alone was interested in the ties for which suit was brought. We think this presented a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.
Judgment is reversed, and new trial ordered.