DocketNumber: Calendar No. 30,738
Citation Numbers: 146 Mich. 326
Filed Date: 11/7/1906
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/8/2022
At the request of counsel we file the following memorandum of our reasons for denying the motion to modify our decree in the above-entitled cause:
The decree of this court awarded a money judgment (the amount to be subsequently determined) against the Detroit Trust Company,'receiver, and the Title Guaranty & Trust Company, surety on the appeal bond. It limits the Title Guaranty & Trust Company’s liability to $10,-000, being the amount of its bond, and provides that the decree shall constitute a claim against the property and assets of E. Bement’s Sons and the proceeds thereof in
We are asked to modify the decree in this particular, and to grant a rehearing if this is not otherwise practicable. We see no occasion to do either. Had Mr. Sparrow received the stock to which he was entitled, he could not be permitted to realize more out of it than other preferred stockholders, and it is obvious that none of them could realize anything until E. Bement’s Sons’ debts should be paid in full. Owing to the fact that the stock which of right should have gone to him, which he might have sold, was withheld and otherwise disposed of by E. Bement’s Sons, he has been treated as a creditor of E. Bement’s Sons, his claim being allowed at the valúe of the stock when appropriated; and this is as favorable consideration as he has a right to expect. Apparently it is satisfactory. He is not making this application. It comes from a surety company, who for a consideration has given its undertaking to pay this decree or pay the penalty of its bond. It has no just claim to a preference, or to be relieved from its obligation at the expense of the creditors generally.