Stork v. Stelmack

Per Curiam.

An execution and levy was made against certain real property of defendants for the purpose of satisfying plaintiff’s judgment against defendants. Defendants’ motion to cancel the execution. was gi’anted by the circuit court on the ground that the judgment had been satisfied by a previous execution sale on other property of defendants and from this ruling plaintiff: appeals.

A review of the briefs and record discloses that there was a previous execution sale to plaintiff of real propex'ty of defendants at a bid in excess of the amount of the judgment. Plaintiff’s contention that the prior, executioxi sale is void because of the foreclosure of a prior recorded mortgage is untenable.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Quinn, P. J., and T. K. Kavanagh and Corkin, JJ., concurred.