DocketNumber： Docket No. 9215
Citation Numbers： 28 Mich. App. 656, 185 N.W.2d 185, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1263
Judges： Beasley, Gillis, Lesinski
Filed Date： 12/9/1970
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/18/2024
After a nonjury trial, the trial court found defendant guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit rape (MCLA § 750.110 [Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 28.305]) and gross indecency (MCLA § 750.338b [Stat Ann 1954Rev § 28.570(2)]).
The defendant contends that it was error to deny his motion to quash the information on the ground that the prosecution failed to prove venue in Wayne County at the preliminary examination.
At the preliminary examination the evidence indicated that the offense took plaee in Taylor. No testimony was offered to show that Taylor is in Wayne County. However, the trial court took judical notice of the fact that Taylor is a city in Wayne County.
In general, a court may take judicial notice of the locations of political subdivisions of the state. For example, it has been held proper to take judicial notice that Detroit is in Wayne County. Westlawn
The same ruling has been made where judicial notice was taken of the fact that Flint is located in Genesee County, People v. Ely (1943), 307 Mich 452.
Venue has been held to be established when the crime has been shown to have been committed in a township located within a particular county, even though no mention of the county was made. People v. Ranes (1925), 230 Mich 384; People v. 1922), 219 Mich 550. These cases amply support the trial court’s ruling.
The defendant also contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding that defendant possessed the intent to rape. However, the record supports the finding that the defendant had an intent to rape. The defendant forced his way into a woman’s home, struggled with her, forcibly disrobed her, forced her to lie on the bed and started to take off his pants. At this point she began to plead with him, saying that she had just had a baby and that he would kill her. After this he forced her to perform an act of fellatio. These facts fully support the trial court’s finding that the defendant entered the home with an intent to commit rape.
Affirmed.