DocketNumber: Docket No. 286784
Citation Numbers: 288 Mich. App. 661
Judges: Donofrio, Owens, Sawyer
Filed Date: 6/10/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/9/2022
This case presents the question whether the circuit court possesses the jurisdiction to try a defendant on a misdemeanor charge when the accompanying felony charge was dismissed before the beginning of trial. We hold that it does not and that the
This case arises from a traffic stop by the Michigan State Police in Wayne County. The traffic stop resulted in defendant being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI).
MCL 767.1 generally grants the circuit court jurisdiction over all criminal cases, felony and misdemeanor. But MCL 600.8311(a) specifically grants the district court jurisdiction over misdemeanors punishable by not more than one year in jail. In People v Veling,
None of these circumstances was present here. Had trial commenced on both charges and the felony charge been dismissed by motion or directed verdict, perhaps the Schoeneth exception could be said to have applied. But that is not what happened. The felony charge was dismissed before trial. Once that occurred and only a misdemeanor charge that came within the district court’s jurisdiction under MCL 600.8311 remained, we believe that under Veling the appropriate course of action for the circuit court was to remand the matter to the district court rather than for the circuit court to proceed to trial solely on the misdemeanor charge.
In light of our resolution of this issue, we need not address the remaining issues raised by defendant.
Reversed.
MCL 257.625(1)
People v Veling, 443 Mich 23, 32-35; 504 NW2d 456 (1993).
Id.
People v Schoeneth, 44 Mich 489; 7 NW 70 (1880).
People v Loukas, 104 Mich App 204; 304 NW2d 532 (1981).
It is on this basis that both of the charges here were to be tried together in circuit court. The misdemeanor followed the felony charge to circuit court.
People v Schakelford, 146 Mich App 330; 379 NW2d 487 (1985).
In Shackelford, the defendant was tried on a misdemeanor marijuana possession charge that was enhanced to a felony as a second offense. Defendant was convicted of the felony possession charge, but thereafter the prosecutor moved to dismiss the felony enhancement, leaving only the misdemeanor possession charge. Id. at 332-333.
People v Goecke, 457 Mich 442; 579 NW2d 868 (1998).