DocketNumber: No. 25,902.
Citation Numbers: 212 N.W. 738, 171 Minn. 85
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 4/8/1927
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
It was found that adultery had been committed by defendant as alleged by plaintiff but that he had condoned it. The principal point here is that upon the issue of condonation the decision is opposed by a manifest preponderance of the evidence. The facts are such that discussion would be disagreeable as well as serving no useful purpose. The question was largely one of veracity as between plaintiff and defendant. Our examination of the record has not disclosed anything, the whole case considered, which justifies us in disturbing the findings of fact.
Plaintiff was found possessed of property of the net value of more than $15,000 and a monthly income from his business of more than $300. In that situation, we cannot say that error was committed in awarding permanent alimony of $5,000. In view of the fact that we decline to make any additional allowance here, it is not contended that the attorneys' fee of $500 was excessive.
Order affirmed. *Page 87