DocketNumber: No. 28,990.
Citation Numbers: 245 N.W. 150, 187 Minn. 252
Judges: WILSON, C.J.
Filed Date: 11/4/1932
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
In my opinion the statute, G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 4274(43), makes an application for retraining compensation ancillary to the *Page 259 original proceeding. If that be true, the circumstances of this case present no question of limitation upon the remedy sought but only one as to the jurisdiction of the industrial commission to provide it. In view of the express statutory authority to do so "on application," the jurisdiction plainly exists. If the word "award" used in § 4319 is considered synonymous with "decision," as it should be, the statutory authority for the rehearing is equally plain.
While the jurisdiction of the industrial commission, once it attaches to a claim for compensation, is continuing, it is not without end. Where it terminates in a given case must depend upon the circumstances.
In Kummer v. Mutual Auto Co.