DocketNumber: No. C4-89-532
Citation Numbers: 441 N.W.2d 808, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 156, 1989 WL 66403
Judges: Keith
Filed Date: 6/23/1989
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing, by majority, the compensation judge’s determination that the employee’s coronary artery disease did not arise out of and in the course of his employment as a police officer for the City of Minneapolis. The workers’ compensation claim in this case was premised on significant disability arising out of atherosclerotic coronary artery occlusive disease for which the employee, a police officer with the department since 1968, underwent quadruple coronary artery bypass surgery in 1985. Specifically, the claim was based on an allegation that the coronary artery disease was causally related to work-related stress. The compensation judge denied benefits finding (a) that the statutory presumption of causation for peace officers
Reversed and decision of compensation judge reinstated.
. Minn.Stat. § 176.011, subd. 15(a) (1988) provides in pertinent part:
If immediately preceding the date of disablement or death, an employee was employed on active duty with an organized fire or police department of any municipality, as a member of the Minnesota state patrol, conservation officer service, state crime bureau, as a forest officer by the department of natural resources, or sheriff or full time deputy sher*809 iff of any county, and the disease is that of myocarditis, coronary sclerosis, pneumonia or its sequel, and at the time of employment such employee was given a thorough physical examination by a licensed doctor of medicine, and a written report thereof has been made and filed with such organized fire or police department, with the Minnesota state patrol, conservation officer service, state crime bureau, department of natural resources, or sheriffs department of any county, which examination and report negatived any evidence of myocarditis, coronary sclerosis, pneumonia or its sequel, the disease is presumptively an occupational disease and shall be presumed to have been due to the nature of employment.