DocketNumber: Nos. 17,444—(139)
Citation Numbers: 116 Minn. 226, 133 N.W. 564, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1356
Judges: Brown
Filed Date: 12/8/1911
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
Action to recover upon a promissory note, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and defendant appealed -from the judgment rendered thereon.
It appears from the record that on February 6, 1908, defendant made and delivered to the Smith & Nixon Company his promissory note for $100, due and payable February 6, 1909. Thereafter,
Our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that the several questions stated were properly submitted to the jury and that the evidence sustains their verdict. Defendant may have paid the note to the Smith & Nixon Company, as claimed. But the payment was made long before the note became due, and prior to the transfer thereof to plaintiff.. The note was not surrendered to defendant, but was left in the hands of the payee. Defendant does not claim the benefit of this payment, under the circumstances, except in connection with the contention that plaintiff was not a bona fide holder, and that the payment so made was ratified and confirmed by plaintiff. The charge of the court sufficiently covered these claims, and there was no error in the refusal of the special requests made by defendant, nor in the exclusion of evidence. That plaintiff was a bona fide holder of the note was established beyond question, and the 'evidence presented no controversy thereon for submission to the jury.
This covers all. that is necessary to be said, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.