DocketNumber: Nos. 19,770—(164)
Citation Numbers: 133 Minn. 367
Judges: Bunn
Filed Date: 6/30/1916
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/9/2022
In this personal injury action there was a verdict for plaintiff in the' sum of $3,000, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.
Liability was and is admitted by defendant. The appeal is based upon alleged errors in the admission of evidence, and upon the claim that the verdict is excessive. The chief errors claimed consist in permitting plaintiff and a medical witness to testify that she had trouble after the acci
There was no reversible error in overruling an objection to a question asked of an expert witness on the ground that it did not properly state the evidence. There was no material misstatement.
We have examined the record with reference to the question of damages, with the conclusion that the sum awarded is not so clearly excessive as to warrant our interference with the verdict after the trial court has approved it.
Order affirmed.