Latterance Dontae Adams v. State of Mississippi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2017-KA-00446-COA
LATTERANCE DONTAE ADAMS A/K/A APPELLANT
LATERRANCE DONTA ADAMS
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/16/2016
TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER A. COLLINS
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LEAKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
BY: ERIN E. BRIGGS
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: LAURA HOGAN TEDDER
NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY
DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 07/17/2018
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
BEFORE LEE, C.J., WILSON AND WESTBROOKS, JJ.
WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1. Latterance Adams was indicted for unlawful possession of a cell phone while
confined in a correctional facility. At trial, Michael Jones, a security captain at Walnut
Grove Correctional Facility, testified that as he was making his rounds on February 20, 2015,
he noticed an open cell door. The cell was assigned to Yotyler Miller and Alvin Green, and
a third inmate, Adams, was in the cell with Miller and Green. Jones testified that the cell
door should have been closed, and there was “no reason for three offenders to be inside [one]
cell.” Jones placed Adams, Miller, and Green against the wall and conducted a pat search
of each of them. Two other correctional officers witnessed him search the inmates. All three
officers testified that Jones recovered three cell phones, one from each inmate. Jones
recorded the phones’ serial numbers in an incident report, the phones were placed in evidence
bags, and Jones identified Adams’s phone at trial. After the State rested its case, Adams,
Green, and Miller all testified and denied that they had cell phones. They testified that Jones
did not recover any cell phones when he searched them in the cell. They claimed that Jones
first showed them the phones after they were taken to Jones’s office. In short, Adams,
Green, and Miller alleged that Jones set them up. However, the jury found Adams guilty as
charged, and the circuit court sentenced him, as a habitual offender, to fifteen years in the
custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections.
¶2. Adams’s appointed appellate counsel filed a Lindsey brief, certifying that she has
scoured the record and that the case presents no “arguable issues” for appeal. Lindsey v.
State, 939 So. 2d 743, 748 (¶18) (Miss. 2005). Counsel complied with Lindsey by sending
Adams a copy of the brief and advising him of his right to file a pro se brief, see id., but
Adams did not file a brief. Pursuant to Lindsey, we have “conducted an independent and
thorough review of the record, and we conclude that there are no issues that warrant
reversal.” Taylor v. State, 162 So. 3d 780, 787 (¶18) (Miss. 2015). The State presented
sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. It was the jury’s role to assess the witnesses’
credibility and resolve conflicts in the evidence, see Little v. State, 233 So. 3d 288, 289 (¶1)
(Miss. 2017), and there is no basis for us to disturb the jury’s verdict on appeal. Therefore,
Adams’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2
¶3. AFFIRMED.
LEE, C.J., IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES, CARLTON, FAIR,
GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS AND TINDELL, JJ., CONCUR.
3