Judges: WILLIAM L. WEBSTER
Filed Date: 7/13/1988
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dear Senator McCarthy:
This opinion is in response to your question concerning rollback of the voter-approved property tax rate increases for the Eureka Fire Protection District. The question you posed is as follows:
Did the Missouri Auditor properly rollback three cents ($.03) of the 1987 tax levy of the Eureka Fire Protection District of St. Louis and Jefferson Counties, Missouri, under Missouri Revised Statute
137.073 , concerning reassessment generally, where an increase in both the general and ambulance levies of said district had been voted upon and passed by the voters of the Eureka Fire Protection District, which propositions submitted to the voters were in conformance and compliance with Missouri Revised Statute321.244 , concerning fire protection districts specifically?
Based on information we have been provided, we understand that at the election on April 7, 1987, voters of the Eureka Fire Protection District, St. Louis and Jefferson Counties, Missouri, approved the following propositions:
Proposition No. 1: Shall the Board of Directors of the Eureka Fire Protection District be authorized to increase the rate of levy for funds to provide for the support of the district from forty-four cents ($0.44) to seventy-five cents ($0.75) on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation? Proposition No. 2: Shall the Board of Directors of the Eureka Fire Protection District be authorized to increase the rate of levy for funds to provide for the support of emergency ambulance service of the district from eleven cents ($0.11) to thirty cents ($0.30) on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation?
Substantiating documentation for the levy increases was forwarded to the Missouri State Auditor's Office for review. After reviewing the substantiating documentation, the Auditor's office determined that the fire protection district had failed to comply with the provisions of Section
Chapter 137, RSMo, deals with the assessment and levy of property taxes. Section
(2) . . . In the year of general reassessment, the tax rate ceiling, as calculated under this section, of each political subdivision may be increased as follows:
(a) For political subdivisions in which the voters thereof approved an increase in the rate of levy which was advertised, in writing or by publication, or both, by the political subdivision as being based on assessed valuations in the year of general reassessment, the total increase in the rate of levy so approved by the voters of such political subdivision;
(b) For political subdivisions not included in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the tax rate ceiling of such political subdivisions shall be increased by an amount which will generate the same amount of tax revenues as the increase approved by the voters of the political subdivision would have generated if such increase had been included in the rate of levy imposed in the year prior to general reassessment.
Section
Chapter 321, RSMo, deals with fire protection districts. Chapter 321 was amended to include Section
321.244 Reduced tax levy may be increased to maximum limits, by elections, ballot form. — 1. Any fire protection district which has revised or reduced any levy which it has been authorized to impose under the provisions of section321.225 ,321.240 ,321.241 ,321.243 ,321.610 , or321.620 , under any provision of the constitution or laws of this state, may increase each such revised or reduced levy up to, but not in excess of, the maximum limits allowed under the section authorizing the rate of levy sought to be increased by submitting the following proposition to the voters of the district at any primary, general or special election:Shall the board of directors of the . . . . . . . . . . . Fire Protection District be authorized to increase the rate of levy for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Insert purpose of which tax is levied)
from. . . . cents to . . . . . . . cents on each one hundred dollars of assessed valuation?
____ Yes ____ No
2. If any of the propositions submitted under subsection 1 of this section is approved by a majority of the voters of the district voting thereon, the board of directors may increase the levy which was the subject of such proposition to the amount authorized by such proposition.
Section
Section
The repeal of a special statute by implication through the enactment of a later general statute is not generally favored unless the legislative intent is fairly shown. Edwards v. St.Louis County,
Conclusion
It is the opinion of this office that Section
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM L. WEBSTER Attorney General
Substituted "required to revise rates of levy by subsections 2 and 3 of this section or section
22 of articleX of the Constitution of Missouri shall calculate" for "shall annually calculate" and substituted "revision" for "rollback" in the first sentence of subsec. 5(2). Substituted "In the year of general reassessment" for "for fiscal year beginning in 1985" in the fifth sentence of subsec. 5(2). Substituted "assessed valuations in the year of general reassessment" for "1985 assessed valuations" in subsec. (5)(2)(a). Substituted "the year prior to general reassessment" for "1984" at the end of subsec. (5)(2)(b).