DocketNumber: No. ED 105617
Citation Numbers: 540 S.W.3d 436
Filed Date: 2/20/2018
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/21/2022
Derrick Curtis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).