Davis v. State

PER CURIAM

Nathaniel Davis appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment" denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentences, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal *900and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).