DocketNumber: No. ED 81193
Citation Numbers: 101 S.W.3d 323
Judges: Crane, Gaertner, Simon
Filed Date: 3/25/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/2/2021
ORDER
Movant, Elisha J. Davis, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).