In re Marriage of Dieter

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from a decree dissolving the parties’ marriage. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in dividing the marital property and in ordering him to pay respondent’s attorney fee of $1,500.

The record reveals that no error of law appears and that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

All concur.