McKenney v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jeffrey McKenney, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential purpose. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).