DocketNumber： No. ED 97720
Citation Numbers： 366 S.W.3d 669, 2012 WL 1926448, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 729
Judges： Ahrens, Gaertner, Richter
Filed Date： 5/29/2012
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/14/2024
ORDER
Nolan H. (“Father”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to N.D.H., his son, born on April 10, 2000. Father contends that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because its findings that several conditions of section 211.447.5 RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2007 were met were not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. Father also asserts that even if statutory grounds for termination existed, termination of his parental rights was not in the best interests of the children.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).