Penny v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Penny appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree robbery. Penny contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to strike an allegedly unqualified juror for cause. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).