Clinch v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Clinch appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree murder. Clinch contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge an allegedly unqualified juror for cause. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).