DocketNumber: No. ED 98918
Citation Numbers: 402 S.W.3d 612
Judges: Cohen, Mooney, Odenwald
Filed Date: 6/28/2013
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/2/2021
ORDER
Tommie Pollard (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant asserts that his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to explain the consequences of entering an Alford
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).