Miller v. State

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Miller contends the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).