Guzman v. State

Order

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Guzman appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to first-degree assault. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney by not fully advising him about a plea offer. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).