Gomez v. State

Order

Per Curiam:

Braulio Gomez appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Gomez argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims because trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call two witnesses at Gomez’s trial. But because trial counsel’s decisions were based upon reasonable trial strategy, the motion court committed no error in overruling Gomez’s motion. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).