Mudd v. Barton

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Amber Barton (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of Defendant’s motion to set aside and vacate a judgment entered against her on September 16, 2010. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).