Burle v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Erik Burle, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen Post-Conviction Proceedings and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.” We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).