Sauerbry v. State

Order

Per Curiam:

Jeffrey Sauerbry appeals the motion court’s denial, following a hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. Sauerbry argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion in that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to object to certain testimony at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).