Birdno v. State

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Birdno appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no clear error in the motion court’s findings and conclusions. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).