DocketNumber： No. 7,104.
Judges： PER CURIAM.
Filed Date： 4/24/1933
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/11/2024
On motion of the Attorney General, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, the question sought’ to be reviewed having become moot by the enactment of Chapter 108, Laws of 1933, declaring that removal of personal property covered by a conditional sale contract, without consent of the vendor, constitutes larceny.