Robertson v. Steele

June 12 2012
DA 11-0702
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
2012 MT 127N
JOSEPH ROBERTSON, individually, and
CARRI ROBERTSON, individually,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
vs.
CHRISTINA M. STEELE, Personal Representative
of the Estate of William C. Remior, deceased,
TINA STEELE, individually, GEORGE ESSEX,
individually, and THE EARTH ANGEL HEALTH
MINE,
Defendants and Appellees.
APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fifth Judicial District,
In and For the County of Jefferson, Cause No. DV 09-36
Honorable Wm. Nels Swandal, Presiding Judge
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For Appellants:
Joseph Robertson and Carri Robertson, self-represented, Basin, Montana
For Appellee:
Christina M. Steele, self-represented, Basin, Montana
Submitted on Briefs: May 30, 2012
Decided: June 12, 2012
Filed:
__________________________________________
Clerk
Justice Brian Morris delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating
Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve
as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court’s
quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.
¶2 Appellants Joseph Robertson and Carri Robertson (Robertsons) appeal from the
District Court’s order denying their claims for damages based upon the alleged unlawful
actions in blocking access along a road carried out by Appellees Christina M. Steele,
personal representative of the Estate of William C. Remior, deceased, Tina Steele, and The
Earth Angel Health Mine (Steeles). We affirm.
¶3 We previously addressed a dispute between Robertsons and Steeles in Steele v.
Robertson, 2011 MT 172N, 362 Mont. 541, 272 P.3d 123. Our resolution of that dispute did
not end the matter.
¶4 Robertsons hold a certificate of location for an unpatented mining claim in Jefferson
County located on property owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Robertsons
apparently also have a patented mining claim known as the Peacock. Robertsons claim that
Steeles were blocking access to these mining claims. Robertsons filed a verified complaint
on October 21, 2011, in which they sought damages, among other matters, for Steeles’
actions in blocking the road that provided access to the mining claims.
¶5 The court held a trial in the matter and determined that the short portion of the road at
issue already was open to the public and has been used by the public in the past to access
part of Steeles’ business. The court found that Robertsons have the right to maintain the
2
road and remove obstructions on the road in order to reach their mining claims on BLM
property. In light of the fact that this access already exists and that the public road burdens
Steeles’ property, the court determined that Steeles could not claim any damages for
Robertsons’ use of the road. The court similarly denied Robertsons’ claim for damages
caused by Steeles’ efforts at blocking the road. Robertsons appeal the District Court’s denial
of their claim for $150,000 in damages.
¶6 Both parties appear pro se on appeal. We review for clear error a district court’s
findings of fact. AAA Constr. of Missoula, LLC v. Choice Land Corp., 2011 MT 262, ¶ 17,
362 Mont. 264, 264 P.3d 709. We review for correctness a court’s conclusions of law.
Performance Mach. Co. v. Yellowstone Mt. Club, LLC, 2007 MT 250, ¶ 12, 339 Mont. 259,
169 P.3d 394. We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d),
of our 1996 Internal Operating Rules, as amended in 2006, that provides for memorandum
opinions. It is manifest on the face of the briefs and the record before us that substantial
evidence supports the District Court’s findings of fact and that the District Court correctly
applied the law to those facts.
¶7 Affirmed.
/S/ BRIAN MORRIS
We Concur:
/S/ MIKE McGRATH
/S/ JAMES C. NELSON
/S/ PATRICIA COTTER
/S/ JIM RICE
3