DocketNumber: CAUSE NO. DC-05-606
Judges: Chairperson, Gilbert, Hon, Newman, Seeley
Filed Date: 3/31/2014
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024
On May 4, 2006, the Defendant was sentencedforCOUNTI:OPERATINGAMOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS, FOURTH
On February 1, 2013, the Defendants prior sentence imposed on May 4,2006, was revoked. The Defendant was sentenced for COUNT I: DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, FOURTH OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE, a felony, in violation of Section 61-8-401, MCA, to Five (5) years commitment to the Montana State Prison. The Court recommends placement at the boot camp program. Upon successful completion of the boot camp program the Defendant’s remaining sentence shall be suspended; and the terms and conditions contained in the Judgment given June 15, 2006.
On February 28, 2014, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).
The Defendant was present by Vision Net from the Great Falls Regional Prison in Great Falls, Montana, and was represented by Ed Sheehy, Jr., Montana Office of Public Defender. Mr. Sheehy appeared by Vision Net from his office in Missoula, Montana, due to severe weather and traveling conditions. The State was not represented.
Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 12, Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana, provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct. The sentence shall not be reduced or increased unless it is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence shall be AFFIRMED.
Done in open Court this 28th day of February, 2014.