Citation Numbers: 80 S.E. 888, 166 N.C. 208, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 366
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 2/18/1914
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
This is an action to establish the right to use a certain lane, described in the complaint, and to restrain the defendant from obstructing the same.
At the conclusion of the evidence the defendant moved for (209) judgment of nonsuit, which was refused, and he excepted.
There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.
This is the second appeal in this action. On the first appeal, which is reported in
The evidence in the two records is practically the same, and adhering to our former decision, the ruling on the motion for judgment of nonsuit must be affirmed.
The exceptions to the admission of evidence are without merit. It was competent to prove that the plaintiff directed his tenants to use the lane, as some evidence of an adverse user under claim of right.
No error.
Cited: Weaver v. Pitts,