Judges: Manning
Filed Date: 12/20/1910
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Motion to retax bill of costs adjudged against the defendant. The defendant moved to strike out in the bill of costs the item, "Ten continuances of $3," and as pertinent thereto his Honor found the following facts: "That the case was docketed in this court on 5 August, 1907; that since that time the case has never been reached for trial; that no order continuing the case has never been made; that the case has never been placed on the calendar for trial; that ten terms of the court have elapsed since the case was docketed." Upon these facts his Honor refused the motion to retax, and adjudged the bill of costs as made out by the clerk to be correct and legal. The defendant appealed. Section 2773, Revisal, prescribes the fees to be charged by clerks of the Superior Court for official services rendered in the course of actions pending in the Superior Courts, and for the doing of other acts. Among these fees, it is prescribed, "Continuance, 30 cents," and it was for the charge for ten continuances, at 30 cents each, amounting to $3, that defendant objected to in the bill of costs, upon the facts found by his Honor.
We think his Honor should have disallowed the item. There was no motion made by either party to the action for a continuance of the trial of the cause, and no order made by the presiding judge granting such continuance, and no entry of such motion and order by the clerk in the minutes of the court. It is for such services performed upon motion and order that the charge for a continuance is to be allowed, and not upon the state of facts found by his Honor. In Blount v. Simmons,
Reversed.