Citation Numbers: 150 S.E. 13, 197 N.C. 574
Judges: STACY, C. J.
Filed Date: 10/23/1929
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Civil action in ejectment.
From a judgment of nonsuit entered on motion of defendants at the close of plaintiff's evidence, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning error.
There is evidence on behalf of plaintiffs tending to show that their ancestor and predecessor in title, H. F. Pitman, took a deed for the Locusin quo on 22 June, 1878, and that the same was duly registered 10 November, 1879. (The description may need to be aided by parol, but this the plaintiffs offered to do. Bissette v. Strickland,
All evidence offered by plaintiffs tending to show that Berry Oxendine was first the tenant of their ancestor and later their own tenant was excluded, presumably upon the ground that it violated the meaning and spirit of C. S., 1795, which disqualifies a party or person interested in the event, or a person from, through or under whom such a party or interested person derives his title or interest, from testifying as a witness in his own behalf, or in behalf of the party succeeding to his title or interest, against the executor, administrator or survivor of the deceased person, concerning a person transaction or communication between the witness and the deceased, except where the executor, administrator or survivor, or person so deriving title, is examined in his own behalf, or the testimony of the deceased person is given in evidence concerning the same transaction or communication. In re Mann,
It has been the uniform holding with us that where the relation of landlord and tenant exists, and the latter takes possession of premises under a lease from the former, the tenant will not be permitted to dispute the title of the landlord, either by setting up an adverse claim to the property or by undertaking to show that it rightfully belongs to a third person, during the continuance of such tenancy, or without first surrendering the premises to the landlord. Hobby v. Freeman,
It may be well to add, also, that in actions between individual litigants, as here, when one claims title to land by adverse possession and shows such possession (1) for seven years under color, or (2) for twenty years without color, either showing is sufficient to establish title in this jurisdiction. Dill Corp. v. Downs,
Reversed.