Judges: Clark
Filed Date: 4/12/1911
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
ALLEN, J., did not sit on the hearing of this case.
This case was before us,
The evidence is that the plaintiff bought said lumber and timber, but to be delivered at the defendant's road and not to the tramroad, and he contends therefore that he is entitled to the stipulated compensation of 1/2 cent per 100 pounds for hauling freight for his vendors. *Page 460 This evidence is uncontradicted, and unless it were alleged and shown that said allowance of 1/2 a cent per 100 pounds were excessive and that the transaction is a mere device to evade the statute against the allowance of rebates and is in truth a discrimination by which the plaintiff was to be charged a lesser rate than other shippers from the point where the defendant railroad received the freight, the contract is valid. In the absence of such allegation and proof, the presumption is in favor of the correctness of the proceedings below.
The prayer to instruct the jury upon the theory that the lumber and timber were the property of the plaintiff was properly refused, there being no evidence to support it.
No error.
(584)