Poole v. . Jones

Per Curiam.

Tbe appeal presents several exceptions which were •the subject of earnest debate before us, and while they are not altogether free from difficulty, a careful perusal of tbe entire record confirms us in tbe belief that tbe ease has been tried in substantial accord with tbe principles of law applicable.

Tbe charge, when taken as a whole, would seem to be free from any reversible error.

Tbe case presents no new or novel question of law; it only calls for tbe application of old principles to new facts. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.